cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts  Monday  June 7  1909

Premium

20.500.12592/8qcf20

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday June 7 1909

1909

435 of the Criminal Procedure Code that if by “cocurrent jurisdiction” in the above extract was meant not merely jurisdiction to deal finally with the application but also the jurisdiction to refer to the High Court then the revisional jurisdiction of the Sessions Judge and the High Court would really be co-extensive and the proviso which the Judges were so careful to add would be meaningless [...] The facts of the case as sifted and laid bare in the judgment of the High Court deserve the inost careful study on the part of the public as also of those in authority. [...] The opening paragraph of the judgment outlines the nature of the case which was sought to be setup at the beginning of the trial. [...] P. in the course of the judicial proceeding in the course of which the offence is committed or at the conclusion of the judicial proceeding or so soon after as to make it the continuation of the same proceeding. [...] On second appeal held that the mere cosolidation of the three Jamas was no considertion and the fact that a small quantity of land within the boundaries of these holdings was on measurement found to be in the possession of the Defendants in each case in excess of the amount rented in the kabuliyat was not in itself 203cciv THE CALCUTTA WEEKLY NOTES.
law
Pages
8
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday June 7 1909
cxcvii-cciv unknown view

Related Topics

All