cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts  Monday  June 14  1909

Premium

20.500.12592/xhqtz8

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday June 14 1909

1909

The methods of the police in the present case the Barrah Dacoity case and the Minapore Bomb case seem to bear a marked family likeness which surely call for some comprehensive action on the part of the highest executive in the land for the protection of the life and liberty of the people. [...] The defence was that the noise was due to the other business carried on in the market and that the Defendant's busness formed no appreciable addition to the noise of the market. [...] ccxi To contradict the existence of the said custom the Defendants filed the Wajib-ul-araiz of the villages in dispute and of the villages in Perganah Mawai and also adduced instances of succession atorariance with the said custom. [...] The above evidence in the case indicates some kind of distinction between the rule of succession adopted by the predecessors of the Appellants and the other zemindars of the same tribe in Basondeh. [...] He contended that the Wajib-uaraiz papers of the villages in the said Perganah other than those in dispute together with the oral evidence and previous judicial recognition were sufficient to establish the custom alleged and that the Courts in India had wrongly admitted in evdence as legal contradiction of the said custom the Wajib-ul-araiz papers of the villages in dispute and of the villa
law
Pages
8
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday June 14 1909
ccv-ccxii unknown view

Related Topics

All