The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday June 12 1911

The principle undelying these provisions is that in order to secure the Government revenue which may suffer by the value of the property being depreciated by imprvident grants or lathes in the proprietors the purchaser of the estate is placed ire the same pstion as the original proprietor at the time of the Permanent Settlement. [...] When the Courts reconised the transferee and the putnidar as entitled to exercise the option they proceeded on the ground that the person having the beneficial interest by such transfer should also have the powers exercisable by the transferor. [...] The real value of the claim has to be determined by the Court and where the decision of the Court is open to appeal this determintion is not finally reached till after the disposal of the case by the final Court of Appeal. [...] XV.) THE CALCUTTA WEEKLY NOTES mit Arogya v. AiSpachi (already cited) the value originally fixed by the Plaintiff (without reference to any determination by the Court or any value subsequently put forward by the parties on the basis of the evidence) should alone determine the forum of the suit as well as the appeal. [...] c. 5. The case on behalf of the trustees of the settlment the claimants in the interpleader issue was that there was no evidence that the settlement was executed with intent to defraud creditors and that the clause relating to the power of the husband and wife to dispose of the furniture which was to be found in Davidson's Precedents of Conveyancing " could not be held to be such a clause