The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday February 1 1915

The Plaintiffs' contention was that the land in suit was at the time of the institution of the suit lying waste and neither party was in posession of it and therefore the Plaintiffs need not have asked for possession. [...] T. L. R. 334)—is that in the circumstances of the present case the goods had not at the time of seizure passed to the buyers ; but that the sellers had reserved a right of disposal or a yus disponendi over them and that the goods Still remained their property and would so n main until the shipping documents had been tendered to and taken over by the buyers and the bill of exchange for the price [...] 855 and Note 171.) As to the suggestion that the eight of seizure or capture of enemy property carried as cargoes in British ships no longer exists after the Declaration of Paris it is obvious that the Declaration only modified or limited the right in favour of neutrals for the benefit and prtection of the commerce of neutrals and in the interest of international comities ; and did not in any [...] On July 31st' 1914 the Plaintiffs and the Dfendants entered into an additional agreement which affirmed the previous agreement and prvided that in view of the war one Batty was to be a partner for the unexpired term of the parnership. during the joint lives of the Defenants on receipt of a salary. [...] In their evidence the Plaintiffs said :— The absence of the Dfendants has not affected the control or managment of the firm and there is no practical Obstacle to the effective continuance of the business." So that at present having regard to that and the license there was no difficulty as regarded outside persons.