The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday April 5 1915

to be forgott3n that the Courts belong to the people and the wishes—even the prejudices—of the people must be borne in mind Independent of public opinion every Judge must be but that is not synonymous with indiffeence to the manner in which the public receive his judgments and the opinion the people have of his honesty. [...] It is also to the credit of the present editor that motives of Easiness rivalry have no place in his enterprise--for a scholarly translation of the Frayaschittadhyaya of the.11Ttakshara having in the meanwhile been published from the Panini Office of Allaliabad Mr. [...] It was of the nature of a boundary dispute that is to say the Plaintiffs were admittedly in possession of the remainder of the land leased to them by the registered kabuliyat and the Defendants were admittedly in possession of the remainder of the land leased to them by their unregistered patta. [...] The case for the Plaintiffs was that-on the Attl June 1907 the Defendant by fraudulent supression of processes obtained an ex partc decree against them for possession of the second property DOW in dispute that the dccreholder not only executed the decree in respect of that property but also for realisation of the costs allowed to him and that he thus managed to purchase the first propert [...] That as it was not competent to the Plaintiffs to invite the Court to vacate the decree on the ground of fraud it was not open to them to have the sale also set aside on the ground of fraud in the decree.