cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts  Monday  April 19  1915

Premium

20.500.12592/b3jrz2

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday April 19 1915

1915

It was contended for the Appellant that inamuch as the minds of the prosecutors had not been affected by the representation that is by the fraud the Appellant could not be held guilty of the offence. [...] O'Gorman) for the Petitioner submitted that the first appeal lay to the District Judge and not to the High Court and that the High Court had no jurisdiction to disturb the finding of fact at which the District Judge had arrived. [...] 8 24 25 and 26 of the Bombay Civil Courts Act XIV of 1869 the said suit ought to have been instituted in the Court of the Second Class Subordinate Judge of Athni or Chikodi and not in the Court of the First Class Subordinate Judge of Belgaum. [...] The Petitioners prayed for special leave to appeal and for posponement of the execution of the sentence passed upon them pending the hearing of the special leave to appeal and the appeal. [...] Barrow Rogers and Nevill the Solicitors for the Pettioners (read the letter ; the substance of it was that the Secretary of State for India was not prepared to postpone the execution of the sentence in the absence of a recommendation to that effect by the Government of India or by the judicial Committee of the Privy Council).
law
Pages
8
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday April 19 1915
cxxi-cxxviii unknown view

Related Topics

All