The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday March 1 1920

To put it in His Lordship's own words : If one man inflicts an injury upon another the resort by the sufferer to reasonable expedients for the bond fide. pdrpose of counter-acting curing or lessening the evil effects of the injury done him does not necessarily absolve the wrondoer even though the sufferer's efforts should in the result undesignedly aggravate the result of injury." The da [...] A regrettable feature of the case was the manner in which it was conducted in the Court of first instance which created " elements of doubts and confusion " notwithstanding that " the difficulties were by no means inherent in the nature of the case." This is one of the grounds that led Lord Wrenbury to dissent from the majority an suggest a new trial Lord Wrenbury said : " It remains that the re [...] This was an application for the inclusion in the printed record of the above appeal of cetain 'papers and particularly some telegrams which passed between the Government of India :a the Government of the Punjab in April last regarding the framing and putting into operation of Ordinance IV of 1919. [...] The qiiestion before the Board being were the Alartial Taw Commissions competent to try the accused the Crown desired to add some documents to the record to show the circumstances under the pressure of which the Ordinances were framed and put into operation and explain any supposed ambiguity in them. [...] The Decree-holder applied for execution on the 19th March 1919 : Held—That the question is whether limittion ran from the date of the decree or the data of the rejection of the application for revisioThe case of Gurupada v. Tarit 1husan (22 C. W. N. 158) discussed and distinguished.