The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday June 13 1921

The question was whether the sigua lure in the visitor's 'pool: of i hotel \'US that of the appellant which the ford Ob+ served was a ' crucial point iu the r/caling with this point in his judgment.lord F.;irkenhead observedo " The expert called for the prosecution gave his evidence with great can‘lour. [...] As regards the impediment ro The right 'Co surrender the law was based in the earlier cases partially on a view of the rights. [...] It follows therefore that the holding also remains udivided: The transferee gets a right of enjoment of the portion of the land transferred to him which forms a part of the holding beloning to his vendor. [...] Chatterjee forgets all his philosophy about tenancy and holding when he concludes that with the sale of a part of the holding of raivat his right in the portion so transferred is extinguished and transmitted to the tranferee who from the moment of the transfer becomes a ctenant with the recorded tenant.'' In other words the tenancy is created merely. [...] was compelled to pay the money to the accusedwho received the money in the house of Indu Bata: and went inside for having the thumb impresion of her on the back of the bond where 'a note was to be made regtirdiog -. such payment and fled iway by the back-door of the; house.