The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Noted of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday July 28 1924

1 71 000 for the salary of ministers and for declaring that the inclusion of the motion in the agenda paper of the Council was illegal. [...] But we regret very much that the Secretary of State and the Government of India should have thought it necessary; to amend the rule regard— ing the presentation of supplementary esti— mates to the Legislative Assembly and the local Legislatures in India. [...] The reasons which we would advance would apply equally in support of the order of refusal of mandamus as also against the grant of injunc— tion as according to the judicial Committee of the Privy Council the same principle applies to an injunction in a suit if the injunction is of the nature of a writ of mandamus or a writ of prohibition." (See 12 C. W. N. 825 at pp. [...] (1) says : The President shall dcide all points of order which may arise and his decision The word " final here must be taken to exclude the jurisdiction of even the highest Court of Justice for if this were not so every member of the Council vsanuld be at liberty to apply to the Court for upsetting the ruling of the President anti it would be impossible for him to regulate the proceedings o [...] 2 20 000 under the head 22E in the Budget estimate for 1.924-25 it was rejected by the Council on the 24th of March 1924 and if the Government had brought in the same motion in another but substantially the saint' form during the same session they could not do so under..