The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday February 6 1928

The council replied that:— “According to the practice of the Profession in England a practising barrister if acting as a director of a company ought not to act as counsel for the company and the cousel is of opinion that the barrister in question would not be right in acting as counsel for the company in this country e.g. [...] But the conditions in Gibraltar are different from the conditions in this country and the council is not prepared to differ from the opinion of the Attorney-General of Gibraltar as to the propriety of a barrister so acting in Gibraltar.” EX-JUDGE PRACTISING The Bar Committee of the Federated Malay States re. [...] To take one example the whole aim of the legislation is to effect a unification of the different grades of layers in the High Courts but even after the Act the position remains anomalous. [...] (4) of the Act the power of the Bengal and the Bombay High Courts to regulate the admission of practitioners on 54"sot XXXII.) THE CALCUTTA WEEKLY NOTES. [...] Babu Prokash Chandra Majumdar (with Babu Satindra Nath Roy Choudhury) for the Respondents : Held—In view of the prayer in the suit for rent by the co-sharer landlord that the other co-sharers might be added in the category of the Plaintiff if the Defendant objected to payment separately the suit was not under sec.