cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Monday  March 6  1944

Premium

20.500.12592/mx11tv

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Monday March 6 1944

1944

We expressed our views on the question of robes quite fully at the time the long battle was raging between the two sections of the Bar and have no wish to return to the cotroversy. [...] But the most striking provision in the Bill is the one which rlates the assumption of the new robes to the termination of the war. [...] When the share of a co-parcener of a Hindu joint family governed by the Mitashara is attached before judgment but such co-parcener dies before any decree has been passed the attachment should be disehared because the attachment does not affect the right of the surviving co-parceners to the said property. [...] The vendor brought a suit for the recovery of the money remaining unpaid within 12 years from the last payment but beyond 12 years from the date of the sale and wanted to enforce the vendor's lien under sec. [...] It was argued that limitation began to run from the date of the sale and not from the date of the last payment and further that the period of limitation prescribed by Art.
law
Pages
2
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Monday March 6 1944
xxxv-xxxvi unknown view

Related Topics

All