The Calcutta Weekly Notes Monday May 29 1944

169 in order to get the arrears of rent from the date of the suit up to the date of the confirmation of the sale. [...] The question will really arise only in cases where the purchaser is a third party and he has deposited the amount in Court to the credit of the decree-holder the purchase price being insufficient to cover it. [...] 169 contnues to speak of the disposal of “ the prceeds of a sale ” and direct that out of such proceeds the costs of the sale are to be paid first next the decretal amount and lastly the post-suit rent. [...] In the latter class of cases the first and the third items are not paid out of the sale prceeds at all but are paid out of the further deposits made by the purchaser because the “ purchase price ” that is to say the sale proceeds are insufficient. [...] 169 in such cases for the reasons that there must necessarily be sufficient money to cover all the amounts mentioned respectively in the first three suclauses so that there is no need to lay down iany order of payment that the whole amount is to go to the decree-holder and that there will be no balance at all left for the judgment-debtor.