The Calcutta Weekly Notes March 13 1950

The accused had not appealed against the order of refusal but now contended (in the Criminal Court) that the licence had been wrongly refused to him and that bfore he could be convicted the Court should find that the order of refusal had been co-rect on merits. [...]. If the order refusing licence were witPout jurisdiction or illegal it was open to the Criminal Court to entertain the plea -against the same but since it was made in the proper exercise of jurisdiction vested in the body and was passed bona fide after considering evidence before it it could not be impugned in the present criminal prceeding as wrong on the merits. [...] But unlike in a matrimonial suit the huband cannot be ordered to furnish the wife with funds to conduct the appeal that is to deposit the sanTe in advance specially where there are no special equities in favour of the wife and where she does not seek to protect the married status in which case alone she could pledge her husband's credit after the decree. [...] On the death of a father governed by the Mitakshara School of Hindu Law his sons.who had been joint with him succeed to his selacquired property and in their hands it is joint family property subject to all the incidents attaching to co-parcenary property and not merely the right of suvivorship inter se The rights of the descendants of each of the sons of the deceased father via-vis t [...] 10 (2) (iii) o f the Indian Income Tax Act in respect of the interest paid by it to its depositors in the State though earned by it in British India on deposits made in the State but brought into British India in the absence of knowledge of the depositors in the State that their deposits would be brought into British India and utilised there for earning interest thereon as income (M.