cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  March 17  1952

Premium

20.500.12592/z6th6z

The Calcutta Weekly Notes March 17 1952

1952

held that the impugned Act was discriminatory and there was no justifiable classification on the basis of which the difference in the procedure of trial ( different from the procedure of trill.tinder' the ordinary law of land) have been Made by the impugned Ad. [...] The challenge failed according to the opinion of the majority on the around of want of evidence to show that the selection of that particular subject by the legislature was unreasonable and based" on arbitrary ground. [...] The advice of the Editor is— "Future appointments of High Court Judges should be made only from the members -of the Bar The reasoning in short is that the position of the members of. [...] Nor can the knowledge of English law or constittional law in particular be said to be a monopoly of the Bar after the publiction by a member of the West Bengal Judicial Service of the Commentary on the Constitution of India which cotains an authoritative treatment inter alia of the English writs and which has won approbation from the head of the English Judiciary as a 'work of great le [...] There have been several appointments from the State Jdiciary to the High Courts in the other States both before and after thinauguration of the Constitution and if notwithstanding the above provision in the Constitution the case of one of the two classes of persons eligible for the office is ignored in the State of West Bengal there will be not only an unfair discrimination and denial of
law
Pages
4
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes March 17 1952
liii-lvi unknown view

Related Topics

All