cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  July 6  1953

Premium

20.500.12592/kqk5j7

The Calcutta Weekly Notes July 6 1953

1953

The argument was titiiat in the absence of any particulars the detenu’s representation before the Advisory Board might fail and the Advisors' Board might recommend the continuance of detention. [...] This brings us to a consideration of the provisions of section r4 of.the Act which enacts a.rule enabling the -Court to grant relief against the forfeiture incurred by the commission of section r2(i) type of default. [...] This is the plain expsition of the structure and meaning of the two sections 12 and 14 of the Act. [...] In this context it is Impossible for the teant defendan t in an ejectment suit to legally pay the rent" within the meaning of section r2(i) and to postullite a possibility of legal payment of rent since the instittion of the suit and during its pendency would amount to a fallacy of petitio princepii. [...] award within the period of lnitation but filed an application under ties t:on 5 of the Limitation Act for excusing the delay in filing the application to set aside the award and that application was dismised an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court having been filed against the order dismissing the application under section 5 of the Limitation Act Held that the application
law
Pages
4
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes July 6 1953
cxxvii-cxxx unknown view

Related Topics

All