cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Reports of Important Decisions of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal from India. November to October  1901-1902

Premium

20.500.12592/wxhd60

The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Reports of Important Decisions of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal from India. November to October 1901-1902

1902

In this case the language of the contract points strongly to the life of the intended or supposed grantor as the limit of the benefit. [...] In this case the language of the contract points strongly to the life of the intended or supposed grantor as the limit of the benefit. [...] There is no provision in the Act as to what is to be done or what the Court can do in the event of the death of the surety or in the event of the surety under such circumstances as the present desiring to be relieved of the burden which he has undertaken. [...] A prelimnary objection was taken on behalf of the decree-holders that as the matter in dispute fell within the provisions of sec 278 of the Code of Civil Procedure and inasmuch as the question was not between the parties to the suit within the meaning of sec. [...] were declared to be his by the former decree but which title ho considers has been endangered by the act of the Armen deputed to give possession to the Defendant of the other lands decreed to him." In 1S72 the Judicial Comittee of the Privy Council dealing with the same section in the case of Chowdry Waked Ali v. Alussamut Jantaee (4) held that although they desired to give the widest moan
law
Pages
1029
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-ii unknown view
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Reports
1-600 unknown view
Report
601-928 unknown view
Backmatter
i-xxxii unknown view

Related Topics

All