The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday March 15 1937

It was accordingly argued though for the first time in the High Court that if the acused had practised fraud and thereby otained the consent of the mother the miltrage would be for that reason an invalid marriage though the circumstance of the parties belonging to different sub-castes might not invalidate it. [...] The former option the Plaintiff has as of right; the other option is available to him only if he can satisfy the Court that he had sufficient cause for the non-appearance or other default which led to the dismissal of the suit. [...] When a suit instituted by a person in forma vauperis and during the pendency of the suit the Plaintiff dies it is open to the legal representative of the deceased Plaitiff either to continue the proceedings as a suit by substitution on payment of the courfee or else file a fresh application for leave to sue as a pauper. [...] Where there has been a payment by a debtor to a creditor and no appropriation has been proved either by the debtor or the creditor it is open to the creditor to apprpriate the amount or any part of it towards the payment of any debt and at any time even during the pendency of a litigation cocerning the payment—but in that case bfore a decree is passed by the Court and not thereafter. [...] Therefore the renouncing of-his right by a mortgagor and getting the name of the mortgagee recorded in the recorof-rights is sufficient to effect a transfer of the equity of redemption.