The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday January 8 1934

It is obvious that to this argument; no anWer is afforded by the principle of intenational law that if a marriage is good by the laws of the country where it is effected it is good all the world over no matter whther the proceeding or ceremony which costituted marriage according to the law of the place would not constitute marriage in the country of the domicile of one or other of _ [...] But the principle does not include any proposition that even if there be no capacity in one of the parties under his or her personal law to contract the marriage still if there be no want of capacity according to the law of the country of celebration and the forms precribed by that law have been gone through the marriage must be deemed valid all the world over. [...] If the English marriage in the case of a Hindu be upheld on the ground that he had merely fallen out of the Hindu community then the privileges of Hindu law would no longer be available to him and he would be held to the duties of his mongamous English marriage. [...] 37 of the Civil Procedure.4Code which lays down a summary procedure for suits upon negotiable instrument does not abrgate the jurisdictiqn of the Court to hear a Defendant at the time of the passing of the decree that the decretal amount should be made payable by instalment although no leave to appear and defend the suit had been obtained. [...] Where there has been an appeal from a preliminary decree in a partition suit and during the pendency of the appeal the final decree is passed the starting point of limtation for the execution of the final decree is the date of the final decree and not the daton which the appeal against the preliminardecree is disposed of.