The Journal of the Ganganatha Jha Research Institute February 1948

It is in the individual that we should find the fulfilment of this perfect unity of the spiritual and the material (including the vital and the mental); the subjective and the objective the being and the becoming. [...] But this itself is a presumption taken from the mystical doctrine whoseA CRITIQUE OF THE PRAMANAS InI pale counterpart is the view of the similarity of all the parts of a compound or the structure of the Atom or the molecule of a compound. [...] Instances can be multiplied to show that this is the place and function of Upamana to explain the sensible by means of the supersensible and to make the sensible truly the mirror of the Real the finite the abode of the Infinite. [...] This attempt is worthwhile since we have so long sought to view the Absolute from the standpoint of the finite individual and failed to arrive at the solution of the problem of the Infinite and the Self and of the status of the ultimate values. [...] Not merely the content of the experiences of the mystic and 4sis or seer-ports but also the manner of their reception has a large part to play in the reconstruction of the Logic of the Infinite.