The Calcutta Law Journal. July 16th 1933

Held (per Pat/ear and Barlee Ti) that the co-surety was liable to pay half the amount but the liability of the members of a Coperative Society though unlimited yet execution cannot be issued against them in respect of a judgment obtained against the society. [...] We have never made any secret of our disapproval of the cheap legal publications mechanically compiled from the indexes of decided cases and in the pages of this journal we have very often recomended the scholarly productions of erudite and well-informed people like the present author. [...] The Introduction to the book is really a masterly production and gives in a nutshell the whole genesis of the stamp law of this country. [...] In his notes on the sections or the articles of the Act the learned author has sufficiently indicated the implications of their wordings and has thereby facilitated the solutions of problems not covered by judicial precedents. [...] Similarly in relation to the question of the right of Public Meeting the students should have been given the genesis of the law and should have been told how the law on the matter has been gradually evolved by the judicial pronouncements or the statute law and how the law now stands in this country why and for what resons it does so and what its present implicitions are.