The Calcutta Law Journal. July 1st 1931

The case for the defendants was that section 31 did not prescribe a period of limitation and that in case of suits already time-barred no acknowledgment made within the two years provided by section 31 colud be availed of by the plaintiffs in such suits and section 19 of the Limitation Act did not apply. [...] The appellants contended that the date of the decree for the purpose of the appeal must be taken as 22nd November x929. [...] The respondent contended that the date of the decree was 8th August 1928 the date when it was original:) passed and that its subsequent vicissitudes had' no effect on the period of appealability and that the only course open to the appelants was to induce the Court to excuse the delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act. [...] The real proof of the truth of a principle is not the finding of it in a book... [...] The appearance of a writing may not be in accord with the type of pens specified by the witnesses in the case.