cover image: The Criminal Law Journal of India  Journal  September 15  1907

Premium

20.500.12592/p96jwm

The Criminal Law Journal of India Journal September 15 1907

1907

The pardon to an accomplice must be made by the District Magistrate a Presidency Magistrate and Magistrate of the first class inquiring into the offence or with the sanction of the District Magistrate any other Magistrate; and sOh pardon to be made on condition of his making a (41 and true disclosure of the whole of the circumstances within his knowledge relative to such offence. [...] In King-Emperor v. Malhar Martand (21) it was said that in applying the general maxim the illustrations to section 114 should he borne in mind that they show that all persons coining within the category of accomplices are not precisely on the same footing and that the nature of the offence and the circumstances in which the accomlices made their statements are to be considered. [...] In cases tried by the Court of Session it is the duty of the Judge among other things to decide all questions of law arising in the course of the trial and especially all questions as to the relevancy of facts which it is proposed to prove and the admissibility of evidence or the propriety of questions asked by or on behalf of the parties; and in its discretion to prevent the production of ina [...] The lawyer may be the servant of any man or of He may be called upon to face the obloquy of the multitude the frowns of power the condemnation of public opinion. [...] When asked as to the place the decisions of his court occupied in Swiss jurisprudence the judge answered that the court had the high and noble part" of adapting law to the march of civilization.
law
Pages
16
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.120178
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Criminal Law Journal of India Journal September 15 1907
33-48 S.D. Chaudhri view

Related Topics

All