cover image: The Criminal Law Journal of India  Journal  June 30  1908

Premium

20.500.12592/8hn44h

The Criminal Law Journal of India Journal June 30 1908

1908

He did not apparently state what reason he had for believing that the persons with whom he talked were the plaintiff and the Boston attorney and the court held the affidavit insufficient as it did not disclose the source of information in such a way as to enable the court to decide upon the probable truth of the statements and the authenticity of the jurisdictional facts." There are expres [...] One has therefore to gather the existence of such inherent powers on a general consideration of some of the provisions of the Code and the policy of the Legislature. [...] VII the duty of the judges to apply the laws not only to what appears to be regulated by thier express dispositions but to all the cases where a first application of them may be made and which appeared to be comprehended either within the express sense of the law or within the consequences that may be gathered from it. [...] The strangest part however was that the SuMagistrate who had meanwhile sent up the record to the District Magistrate mechanically recorded the depositions of the remaining Witnesses while the matter was still enaging the attention of the District Magistrate. [...] Our attention has also been directed to the article of Frederick Trevor Hill a lawyer and man of letters of some reputation in the city of New York which appeared in one of the current magazines on the subject of the disrepute into which the profession of law is alleged to be falling.
law
Pages
12
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.120178
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Criminal Law Journal of India Journal June 30 1908
161-172 S.D. Chaudhri view

Related Topics

All